Friday, July 30, 2010

SmartLipo Treatment Boston

Benefits of Tissue Treated with Smartlipo

Methods

Mini pigs were treated subdermally with two different lasers on both sides of the body. The cannula was placed through one incision point and passed through the tissue to create several individual laser channels. Five passes with equal spacing were made in each of several quadrants. Biopsies were excised after one day of treatment. Histological H&E stains were performed.

Laser Settings

980 nm Diode Laser Max Power output: 20 W Smartlipo MPX Laser Max Power Output: 30 W

Results

Histology stains after one day of treatment show small open channels surrounded with lysed adiposites and thermal coagulated septa. Slides from tissue treated with the Diode CW laser demonstrate more hemorrhaging or bleeding when compared to the tissue treated with the Smartlipo MPX Pulsed Laser. Additional bleeding is evidenced by the increased amount of red blood cells in the tissue.

Tissue Treated 1

Tissue Treated fig1

How Do Different Pulse Durations Affect Bleeding During Laser Lipolysis?

Continuous wave laser results in more bleeding

Tissue Treated 2
Tissue Treated 3

Smartlipo MPX and the Theory of Selective Photothermolysis

Optimal use of the laser energy requires appropriate wavelengths, pulse duration and level of energy. Based on the theory of selective photothermolysis, the pulse duration must be shorter than the thermal relaxation time of the vessel to achieve effective vessel coagulation.* Due to the specific pulse duration of the Smartlipo MPX, it is more effective than continuous wave.

The high energy pulses from the MPX laser heat the vessel quickly, creating a much higher probability of vessel coagulation. The blood vessels exposed to the continuous wave laser continue to bleed since the temperature rises at a slower rate and the peak temperature is lower than that of the Smartlipo MPX.

Tissue Treated 4

1. The pulse structure of the Smartlipo MPX provides a shorter pulse duration than the thermal relaxation period.

2. Continuous wave does not provide the peak temperature level to achieve consistent coagulative effect.



 

Tissue Shrinkage and Skin Elasticity with Smartlipo

Introduction

Lasers utilized for emulsification of fat and coagulation of small blood vessels in conjunction with lipo-aspiration have provided a new approach to body contouring. Papers by Ichikawa1, Badin2 and Goldman3 substantiated the lipolysis and coagulative effect of the Nd:YAG laser through histologic analysis of irradiated fat and tissue sections.



Read more: Tissue Shrinkage and Skin Elasticity with Smartlipo - Benefits of Tissue T...

 

SmartLipo Introduction

Introduction

Laser-assisted lipolysis, or the use of laser technology to treat localized fat deposits, was first introduced to the medical community in 1994 by Apfelberg (Apfelberg, 1994).(1)

While not a total replacement for tumescent liposuction, laser-assisted lipolysis benefits patients specifically looking to treat stubborn areas of fat, or who are not indicated, receptive or in need of more invasive traditional liposuction which uses larger cannulas. In contrast, the use of a laser-guided technique affords patients less blood loss, a shorter recovery time frame, less edema, and decreased pain and discomfort in the post-treatment period.

The most extensively studied, used and validated laser- assisted lipolysis system is the Smartlipo LaserBody- SculptingSM Workstation (Cynosure, Inc, Westford, MA). The first platform of the Smartlipo technology used a 6 Watt 1064 nanometer neodyminium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet (Nd:YAG) laser. Today’s platform includes the use of two clinically proven wavelengths (1064nm and 1320nm) delivered in a blended fashion that utilizes the benefits of both wavelengths. Most importantly, these wavelengths are delivered utilizing high peak powers to deliver the optimal energy to disrupt fat and coagulate blood vessels. Extensive clinical and histological data support the effectiveness of this laser, and while numerous other lasers have followed Smartlipo to market, none are supported with the substantial body of evidence that Smartlipo has accumulated.

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, nearly two-thirds of US adults are overweight, and nearly one-third of the population is considered obese. Given these trends, patient demand for laser-assisted lipolysis is only likely to rise. Recognizing the trend for minimally invasive procedures, physicians have utilized laser-assisted lipolysis to help patients achieve their desired body contour, with minimal downtime and a high degree of satisfaction. Due to patient satisfaction and the minimally invasive nature of this procedure, there is a new set of patients considering a laser lipolysis treatment.

This compendium was designed to present clinical and histological research and results that demonstrate the benefits and applications of the Smartlipo technology as a safe, effective treatment for the removal of unwanted fat. We have divided the research findings into five main categories:

Scientific Rationale

This section outlines the science-backed basis behind the 1064 nm Nd:YAG technology and the blending of the 1064 nm and the 1320 nm wavelengths in performing laser-assisted lipolysis. In our experience, the action of photothermia, in which laser light is converted into heat energy when absorbed by adipose tissue, is what makes the Smartlipo laser effective in the disruption of fat. Furthermore, the positive benefits of the blended 1064 nm and 1320 nm wavelengths have been clearly demonstrated in recent clinical studies.

Clinical Utility

In this section, we review how Smartlipo, the first laser introduced to the market for interstitial laser lipolysis, has been shown to produce less pain, bruising and edema, and faster recovery times than liposuction alone. Goldman, Kim and others observed that the use of Smartlipo results in a less traumatic outcome than with conventional liposuction.

Optimal Patient Selection

In our experience, and as with any medical intervention or treatment, the success of Smartlipo depends on determining the best candidate, area for the procedure, skill of the physician and setting the right expectation for the patient. In initial studies it has been shown that patients looking to treat only localized areas or who are hesitant to proceed with more aggressive procedures represent the ideal target group. In addition, patients with areas of skin laxity are ideal candidates for Smartlipo treatments. Goldman, et al. observed that for patients who are already close to their ideal weight and for whom maximum aspired volume doesn’t exceed 5% of body weight, laser-assisted lipolysis is a favorable course of treatment (Goldman, 2003).(3) Since that time, the technology has evolved, allowing physicians to treat larger areas.

Recent Smartlipo Advancements

The 1064 nm Nd:YAG laser has been shown in clinical research to deliver reproducible results. The Smartlipo MultiPlex (MPX), a next-generation system offering both 1064 and 1320 nm wavelengths, has been shown in documented clinical use to provide faster, safer and more effective delivery of energy. Furthermore, physicians report that the current Smartlipo workstation is useful for an expanding range of cosmetic procedures, including SmartLiftingTM and ablation of sweatglands in treating hyperhidrosis and improving gynecomastia. Further studies are underway to explore other applications in the use of this technology.

The Future of Smartlipo

Laser lipolysis is an exciting area in the field of aesthetic medicine, and is poised for continued expansion and scientific advancement.

In addition to an overview of peer-reviewed articles, this compendium also provides patient case studies featuring before-and-after photos, as well as a series of white papers. We invite you to review these materials thoroughly and discover how, with the support of extensive clinical and histological evidence, the Smartlipo MPX is a technology you can use with confidence for your patients, both today and tomorrow.



   

SmartLipo Laser Lipolysis

As more women and men want to look and feel better, body contouring and liposculpture continue to grow in popularity, making liposuction the most popular cosmetic surgery performed today (ASAPS 2006). Apfelberg is credited for describing the laser-fat interaction1 in 1992 and publications by Blugerman,2 Schavelzon3 and Goldman4 followed where each demonstrated their own experience with lasers on adipose tissue. Badin5 also highlighted the important tissue retraction that he noted with his technique of laser lipolysis.

Read more: SmartLipo Laser Lipolysis - SmartLipo Laser Lipo...

 

SmartLipo for Facial Rejuvenation

As more women and men want to look and feel better about themselves, less invasive options for facial rejuvenation continue to grow in popularity. As the demand for procedures increases and patients spend more time researching options, more informed choices are being made and many times patients opt for technologically advanced procedures.



Read more: SmartLipo for Facial Rejuvenation - SmartLipo for Facial...

   

Page 1 of 2